Resources for Working with Qualitative Data in NVivo

I have compiled some resources on using NVivo. Briefly, some resources for working with NVivo can be found below. I have organized them according to when in the research process you’re likely to need them.

General Resources

I haven’t seen an updated “Getting Started Guide” for the newest version of Nvivo, but the older version (for Nvivo 11) is incredibly useful. The QSRInternational YouTube page is a really useful resource. Their YouTube channel has playlists that take a user through some of the steps they would need for analyzing qualitative data.

The library at the University of Utah has published some research guides that I have also found to be useful. You can find them HERE.

Classification Tables

Individuals wanting to use a multi-method reseach design who want to combine tables of participant characteristics with interview transcripts might be interested in this source. In NVivo, this can be done with classification tables or sheets. The guides located HERE also include videos.

Autocoding

Some might want to do use formatting in MS Word files for autocoding. This source shows how it can be useful for people who have done structured interviews and want to pull codes/nodes from the MS Word file based on how parts of those files are formatted.

Exporting Results

There are a variety of ways you can export your work out of NVivo. This is especially useful for individuals who are working on a remote connection to a computer in the FSC lab or one in their office on campus. Exporting results allows materials in Nvivo to be viewed and manipulated outside of NVivo.

Fall/Winter 2020 Grants Newsletter #2: Humanities

Name of Funder: American Council of Learned Societies

Name of Grant: Collaborative Reading-Workshop Grants in China Studies

Deadline: November 2, 2020

Website: https://www.grantforward.com/grant?grant_id=443832&offset=95

About: A sample application can be found HERE.  Awards up to $50,000.  The American Council of Learned Societies invites applications for Collaborative Reading-Workshop Grants in China Studies. This program is supported by a generous grant from The Henry Luce Foundation. Grants provide opportunities for scholars of different disciplines of the humanities and the humanities-related social sciences to investigate texts that constitute essential points of entry to Chinese periods, traditions, communities, or events in contemporary or historical times. Topics focused on Hong Kong, Macau, Tibet, Xinjiang, and Taiwan are eligible. These grants provide support for collaborative reading of texts in a workshop format that is interdisciplinary and crosses scholarly generations. A wealth of complex and challenging texts is a distinctive feature of the Chinese cultural record, making close reading by a group of scholars especially fruitful, because they can bring to bear a diversity of research, experience, and expertise. Collaboration refers primarily to the sustained, collective examination of texts.

Formats of workshops may vary, but each should be based on texts that illuminate a period, tradition, culture, location, or event. At the workshop each text may be introduced by one or two participants, with others being asked to read and explicate a portion thereof. Close reading and careful translation are thus the basis for workshop discussion. Sufficient time should be provided for sustained collaborative reading – one day would seem too brief; three days much more productive. Reading workshops are less formal than conferences; they involve interactive reading, interpretation and commentary by a seminar-sized group.

Awards for collaborative reading workshops may be used to support travel and lodging costs of participants, acquisition of materials, communications, and local arrangements. Funds may not be used for salary replacement, honoraria, or institutional indirect costs. Funding will not be provided for events that constitute elements of a regularly scheduled series or colloquium, or that otherwise form part of the annual cycle of a university program. Luce/ACLS-funded reading-workshops must bring together scholars who would not otherwise have the opportunity to work together. The primary objects of study should be written texts, but these may be supplemented by images and objects such as archaeological artifacts. The principal objective is a new understanding of the texts and the subject matter they illuminate. A publication might result, but it is not a requirement of the reading-workshop grant. No additional financial support for publication is anticipated.  No university overhead is permitted. Workshops must be held between June 1, 2020, and September 2021. A final report is required on completion of the workshop.


Name of Funder: Kress Foundation

Name of Grant: History of Art Grant

Deadline: Letter of Inquiry (December 15, 2020), Full Application (January 15, 2021). 

Website: http://www.kressfoundation.org/grants/history_of_art/

About: Amounts vary ($5,000-$70,000). The History of Art grant program supports scholarly projects that will enhance the appreciation and understanding of European art and architecture. Grants are awarded to projects that create and disseminate specialized knowledge, including archival projects, development and dissemination of scholarly databases, documentation projects, museum exhibitions and publications, photographic campaigns, scholarly catalogues and publications, and technical and scientific studies. Grants are also awarded for activities that permit art historians to share their expertise through international exchanges, professional meetings, conferences, symposia, consultations, the presentation of research, and other professional events. Grants are awarded to non-profit institutions with 501(c)3 status based in the United States, including supporting foundations of European institutions. These are competitive grants.

Please see Past Grants and Annual Reports on the Kress website for past awards and typical levels of funding.


Name of Funder: National Endowment for the Humanities

Name of Grant: The Media Projects Program

Deadline: January 6, 2020

Website: https://www.neh.gov/sites/default/files/inline-files/Media%20Projects%20NOFO%2020200812-TD-TR.pdf

About: Awards $75,000 for development, $700,000 for production, $1,000,000 for Chairman’s special awards.  Period of development: 6-12 months, production: 1-3 years.

The Media Projects program supports the development, production, and distribution of radio, podcast, television, and long-form documentary film projects that engage general audiences with humanities ideas in creative and appealing ways. All projects must be grounded in humanities scholarship and demonstrate an approach that is thoughtful, balanced, and analytical. The approach to the subject matter must go beyond the mere presentation of factual information to explore its larger significance and stimulate reflection. NEH is a federal funding agency, so the projects that we support must demonstrate the potential to attract a broad general audience. The Division of Public Programs encourages media projects that promote a deeper understanding of American history and culture and advance civic education. The Division of Public Programs also supports media projects that examine international themes and subjects in the humanities. Film and television projects may be single programs or a series addressing significant figures, events, or ideas. Programs may be intended for regional or national distribution, via traditional carriage or online distribution. Films must be longer than thirty minutes. Radio and podcast projects may involve single programs, limited series, or segments within an ongoing program. Production awards may be either broadcast or disseminated online. They may be intended for national or regional distribution. NEH encourages projects that engage public audiences through multiple formats. Proposed projects might include supplementary components to a film, television, radio, or podcast project: for example, book/film discussion programs, supplemental educational websites, or museum exhibitions. All projects applying to the Media Projects program must: • build on sound humanities scholarship

• deepen public understanding of significant humanities questions

• approach a subject analytically, presenting a variety of perspectives

• involve humanities scholars in all phases of development and production

• involve appropriate media professionals

• employ appealing and accessible program formats that will actively engage the general public in learning

Proposed programs must be guided by clear central ideas, and applicants must have a solid command of the major humanities scholarship on their subject. Applicants must have consulted with a team of scholarly advisers to develop the intellectual content that the program will explore. The scholars must represent major fields relevant to the subject matter, have a strong record of research and scholarship in the humanities, and offer diverse perspectives and approaches.


Name of Funder: International Peace Research Association Foundation

Name of Grant: Peace Research Grants

Deadline: January 5, 2021

Website: https://iprafoundation.org/peace-research-grant-instructions/

About:$5,000 available for grant.  Peace Research Grants Ever since the Peace Research Grants Fund was created in 2002, the IPRA Foundation has awarded grants to help fund peace research projects in places as diverse as Argentina, Bosnia, inner city communities in the United States, the Middle East, the Philippines, the Punjab, and Uganda. Please see website for details of the many wonderful projects funded from 2002 through 2012.

The Peace Research Grant Administrator will do an initial review of your project for this award. If your application is deemed suitable, it will be sent out to three IPRA Foundation board members for review. Applicants may receive only one Peace Research grant. The IPRA Foundation Peace Research Grants are small grants intended to assist scholars in undertaking small research projects. These grants are to individuals, not to institutions or organizations. The Foundation does not not allow overhead costs or indirect administrative costs to be covered as part of the grant. The Foundation does not allow rent and other normal living expenses as part of the budget. 

The IPRA Foundation invites proposals that are in line with our Mission, Vision and Core Values: Mission The mission of the IPRA Foundation is to advance the field of peace research through rigorous investigation into the causes of conflict and examination of alternatives to violence. Peace researchers inform peace activities that inspire visions of a peaceful world. Vision The vision of the IPRA Foundation is to: Inspire visions of a peaceful world Promote knowledge of non-violent peace strategies Increase the number of peace scholars around the world Encourage peace science and arts Grow worldwide communication and collaboration among peace researchers Further the purpose and activities of IPRA CORE VALUES Impactful and socially relevant research: We value original research, and peace activities informed by that research, that contributes to the world community and engages key stakeholders. Positive Peace: We value peace and justice by nonviolent means. Respect: We value respecting dignity, humanity, identity and diversity. Empowerment: We value research by people of and within the most vulnerable and marginalized areas of our world community.


Name of Funder: National Endowment for the Humanities

Name of Grant: Research and Development-Tier I: Planning, Basic Research, or Adaptation.

Deadline: May 18, 2021

Website: https://www.neh.gov/sites/default/files/inline-files/Research%20and%20Development%202020%20notice%20of%20funding%20opportunity%2020200515-PR.pdf

About: Tier I provides awards of up to $75,000 for a period of performance of up to two years. This tier supports the following activities:

• Planning and preliminary work for large-scale research and development projects. Proposals must identify one or more project deliverables, such as the creation of an action agenda, work plan, published report, draft standard, or software prototype, that prepares the project team for subsequent stages of work.

• Discrete research projects such as case studies or laboratory experiments.

• Refinements to established standards, models, and tools.

• Adaptation or application of new or recently updated standards, methodologies, tools and equipment, or workflows for targeted institution types and audiences, helping to ensure broad adoption by the field. Activities may take many forms and may include, but are not limited to, any combination of: workshops, symposia, forums, documentation, user testing, public demonstrations, online resources and tutorials, websites, or publications. Tier I projects may be stand-alone studies that do not involve planning or preliminary research for a larger project. Nevertheless, they must address research issues or problems in the cultural heritage field.

Winter 2020 Grants Newsletter: Social Sciences

Russell Sage Foundation
Pipeline Grants Competition
Deadline: November 4, 2020
Website: https://www.russellsage.org/how-to-apply/pipeline-grants-competition
The Russell Sage Foundation (RSF), in partnership with the Economic Mobility and Opportunity program at the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF), seeks to advance innovative research on economic mobility and access to opportunity in the United States. We are particularly interested in research focused on diagnosing and addressing structural barriers to economic mobility in this country. This initiative is designed to support early- and mid-career tenure-track scholars, and to promote diversity by prioritizing applications from scholars who are underrepresented in the social sciences. This includes racial, ethnic, gender, disciplinary, institutional, and geographic diversity. Awards up to $50,000 dollars.

Spring 2020 Grants Newsletter: Social Sciences

American Sociological Association
Annual Meeting Travel Fund
Deadline: April 1, 2020
Link: https://www.asanet.org/careers/grants-and-fellowships/annual-meeting-travel-fund
Eligibility requirements:

 -ASA membership.  This requirement applies to applicants who reside in the United States. The membership requirement is waived for international applicants, who are defined as sociologists who (1) were born outside of the United States and (2) currently live and work (if employed) outside of the United States.

-Listed in the Annual Meeting program.  To receive an AMTF award, applicants must be listed in the Annual Meeting program.

-Not a student. Applicants cannot be current students in an undergraduate or graduate sociology program at the time of application.  Students are encouraged to apply for a Student Forum Travel Award.


American Sociological Association
Student Forum Travel Awards
Deadline: April 1, 2020

Link: https://www.asanet.org/careers/grants-and-fellowships/student-forum-travel-awards
Eligibility requirements: Applicants must be students pursuing an undergraduate or graduate sociology degree in an academic institution and a current student member of ASA at the time of application. Participation in the Annual Meeting program (e.g., paper sessions, roundtables), purpose for attending (e.g., workshop training, Honors Program participation), student financial need, availability of other forms of support, matching funds, and potential benefit to the student are among the factors taken into account in making awards. A travel award committee of the ASA Student Forum convened especially for this purpose will select awardees.


Association for the Sociology of Religion
Joseph H. Fichter Research Grant Competition
Deadline: May 1, 2020
Link: http://www.sociologyofreligion.com/lectures-papers/fichter-research-grant-competition/

Fichter Research Grants are awarded annually by ASR to members of the Association involved in promising sociological research on women in religion or on the intersection between religion and gender or religion and sexualities.  A total of $12,000 is available to be awarded annually, and this amount is usually distributed among several of the leading applications in the year’s competition. Applicants must be members of ASR.  Grant funds can be used to pay for direct research expenses, such as (1) transportation expenses to conduct research; (2) the cost of hiring a research assistant or transcriber; (3) computer software packages that are not typically provided by a college or university (e.g., specialized statistical software packages).

Application procedures:

-Craft proposal of no more than 5 double-spaced pages (1250 words) that outlines the rational and plan of research.  It should have a descriptive title for the research project (e.g., “A Examination of Women’s Leadership Role in Two Catholic Parishes”), present a clear research question, review previous research and theory that forms the background for the study, describe the social scientific research method(s) that will be used to carry out the research as well as a research timetable, and summarize succinctly what the research aims to discover.

-A detailed, one-page budget.  It should indicate the items for which the applicant is seeking funding, and next to each item, the amount it will cost (in U.S. dollars) and the exact purposes for which it will be used. An itemized budget is necessary to enable the Fichter Committee to determine if the budget is reasonable and for decisions concerning partial funding.  Applicants are advised to NOT include items in their proposed budget that ASR does not cover (see above). IMPORTANT NOTE: A single proposal should prepare a budget that includes no more than $5,000.

-An updated curriculum vitae, including a statement of his/her qualifications to carry out the proposed research, and a current email address at which he/she can be contacted during the summer months.


National Science Foundation
Social Psychology
Deadline: July 15, 2020
Website: https://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=5712&org=NSF&sel_org=NSF&from=fund

The Social Psychology Program at NSF supports research and research infrastructure to advance basic knowledge in social psychology. Projects funded by the Social Psychology Program support the NSF mission to promote the progress of science; to advance the national health, prosperity, and welfare; and to secure the national defense. Proposals considered by the Social Psychology Program must communicate both the intellectual merit of the science and its broader societal impacts.

Proposed research should carry strong potential for creating transformative advances in the basic understanding of human social behavior.  Among the many research topics supported are: social cognition, attitudes, social and cultural influence, stereotypes, motivation, decision making, group dynamics, aggression, close relationships, social and affective neuroscience, social psychophysiology, emotions, prosocial behavior, health-related behavior, and personality and individual differences.  Proposals that develop new theories or methods for understanding social behavior are highly encouraged.  Research samples should represent substantial ranges of ethnicities, socioeconomic backgrounds, cultures, and other dimensions of human populations.

Interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary and convergent research approaches are encouraged.  Proposals involving non-human animals are considered only if the research offers clear and direct contributions to understanding human social behavior. The program does not fund research that seeks to improve clinical practice as its primary outcome, nor does it consider proposals with disease-related goals, including work on the etiology, diagnosis or treatment of physical or mental disease, abnormality, or malfunction in human beings or animals.

In assessing intellectual merit, the Social Psychology Program places highest priority on research that is theoretically grounded, based on empirical observation and validation, and with designs appropriate to the questions asked.  In assessing broader impacts, the Social Psychology Program places highest priority on proposals that offer strong potential to benefit society, strengthen our national security interests, improve the quality of life, broaden participation in science, enhance infrastructure for research and education, and include a plan for sharing the results with a wide variety of audiences.

The Social Psychology Program accepts regular research proposals, including Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) proposals, proposals for research in undergraduate institutions (RUI), rapid response research proposals (RAPID), and early-concept grants for exploratory research (EAGER).  The Program also accepts small conference proposals for events (including workshops) being planned one year or more after submission.  The Social Psychology Program does not accept proposals for doctoral dissertation improvement awards.


Sociological Initiatives Foundation
Grant
Deadline: August 14, 2020
Website: http://www.sifoundation.org/

The Sociological Initiatives Foundation is dedicated to the belief that research and action are intrinsically inseparable.  We invite concept proposals for projects that link an explicit research design to a concrete social action strategy.  Projects should also have clear social change goals.

SIF has funded projects in the areas of civic participation, community organizing, crime and law, education, health, housing, immigration, labor organizing, and language/literacy.

Some examples of desired applicants are:

  • community-led academic partnerships
  • advocacy or community groups that conduct research that can withstand challenge in academic and policy arenas
  • grassroots organizations that organize or link to a constituency through their research
  • A limited number of concept applicants will be invited to submit full proposals in the fall of 2020.

Projects typically take two years, so applicants should think in terms of such a timeline.

The Sociological Initiatives Foundation supports social change by linking research to social action.  It funds research projects that investigate laws, policies, institutions, regulations, and normative practices that may limit equality in the United States and Puerto Rico.  It gives priority to projects that seek to address racism, xenophobia, classism, gender bias, exploitation, or the violation of human rights and freedoms.  It also supports research that furthers language learning and behavior and its intersection with social and policy questions.

The Foundation supports research that focuses on improving services and systems and increasing positive social and physical conditions through:

Policy development
Placement and shaping of the policy agenda
Policy adoption or implementation
Policy blocking
Increasing advocacy capacity and political influence
Shaping public sentiment
Addressing challenges related to language and literacy
Language issues include literacy, language loss and maintenance, language policy, language and national security, bilingualism, language and gender, language and law, language disabilities, language and health, language and education, different language cultures, and second language acquisition.

In the context of social and racial inequality dating back centuries, the Foundation supports projects that address institutional rather than individual or behavioral change.  It seeks to fund research and initiatives that provide insight into sociological and linguistic issues that can help specific groups and or communities expand opportunities and challenge injustices.

Grant sizes normally range from $10,000 to $20,000. We look for projects that have an explicit research design and a concrete connection to public or community impact. It is not enough to just write a report or add a focus group to a social change project. The research should build an organization or constituency’s potential to expand public knowledge, impact policy, and create social change.

Short concept proposals are due on August 16th each year.   A limited number of concept applicants are then invited to submit full proposals in November.  Our analysis of past grant recipients has shown that projects typically take two years, so applicants should think in terms of such a timeline.

Some examples of desired applicants are:

  • academic-community partnerships
  • advocacy or community groups that conduct research that can withstand challenge in academic and policy arenas
  • academics that organize or link to a constituency through their research

Types of Support and Limitations

  • Preference is given to providing support in areas that tend to be under-funded and for projects of a size where a Sociological Initiatives Foundation grant can make a difference.
  • For nonprofits, grants are restricted to organizations that are tax-exempt under Section 501(c) 3 of the Internal Revenue Code and classified as “not a private foundation” under section 509(a).
  • The Sociological Initiatives Foundation does not make grants directly to individuals for any purposes.
  • SIF also welcomes applications from academic institutions and other qualified organizations wishing to sponsor research projects by individual scholars or practitioners.
  • No awards are made for dissertation research, honoraria or political purposes.
  • The Foundation does not provide operating support or capital grants.
  • Grant sizes normally range from $15,000 to $20,000.
  • The geographic focus is limited to the United States and its territories.

 

 


National Science Foundation
Division of Social and Economic Sciences
Sociology
Deadline: August 17, 2020
Link: https://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=5369

The Sociology Program supports basic research on all forms of human social organization — societies, institutions, groups and demography — and processes of individual and institutional change. The Program encourages theoretically focused empirical investigations aimed at improving the explanation of fundamental social processes. Included is research on organizations and organizational behavior, population dynamics, social movements, social groups, labor force participation, stratification and mobility, family, social networks, socialization, gender, race and the sociology of science and technology. The Program supports both original data collections and secondary data analysis that use the full range of quantitative and qualitative methodological tools. Theoretically grounded projects that offer methodological innovations and improvements for data collection and analysis are also welcomed.

In assessing the intrinsic merit of proposed research, four components are key to securing support from the Sociology Program: (1) the issues investigated must be theoretically grounded; (2) the research should be based on empirical observation or be subject to empirical validation or illustration; (3) the research design must be appropriate to the questions asked; and (4) the proposed research must advance our understanding of social processes, structures and methods.

Crosscutting Research & Training Opportunities:

  • ADVANCE: Increasing the Participation and Advancement of Women in Academic Science and Engineering Careers
  • Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) Program
  • Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP)
  • Major Research Instrumentation (MRI) Program
  • SBE Postdoctoral Research Fellowships (SPRF)
  • Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU)
  • Research at Undergraduate Institutions (RUI)
  • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program

Russell Sage Foundation
Small Grants
Deadline: None
Link: https://www.russellsage.org/how-to-apply/small-grants-apply/guidelines
Eligibility
Non-tenured junior faculty members who are no more than two years beyond the receipt of their Ph.D. (or equivalent graduate degree). There are no limitations on the disciplinary background of the researcher. The Foundation encourages applications from scholars who are traditionally underrepresented in the scientific disciplines and RSF’s application pool.

Proposal
Proposals should be submitted through RSF’s online application portal. The maximum length of a proposal is four single-spaced pages, excluding budget and bibliography (with standard 11 or 12-point font, and 1-inch margins). Proposals should outline the rationale of the research, clearly state the question(s) under study and the methods and analytic approach to be employed. The proposal should briefly discuss the project’s relevance to the foundation’s programs and how it would contribute to RSF’s mission to improve social and living conditions in the U.S.

Budget
Representative categories of expenditure that should be described in the budget narrative include:
Data acquisition, such as data access fees or the purchase of data sets;
Laboratory costs;
Research assistance;
Subject payments;
Travel (for data collection or access only)
Other research expenses will be considered on a case by case basis.

No funds may be used to support (1) salary or conference travel for the investigator or co-authors, or (2) the purchase of computer hardware or software. RSF does not allow indirect costs on small grants and restricts the project period to one year. A budget that appears to be excessive will be grounds for rejecting a proposal. For detailed information about what can and cannot be included in the budgets, as well as the budget template, see the RSF Budget Guidelines at: http://www.russellsage.org/how-to-apply/apply-project-awards/budget.

Application procedures:
-Applications must be submitted via the RSF online application portal, Fluxx.
-Create an account or log in to your existing account. **Allow up to 48 hours for a new account to be approved**
-Start a new “Small Grants” application and select the appropriate program (BE or CSS) option.
-Submit the following documents:

A concise single-spaced proposal (4 pages maximum) describing the proposed work;

A detailed Excel budget using the Foundation’s budget template;

A budget narrative;

An up-to-date abbreviated CV (maximum of 5 pages per CV);

An organization confirmation letter – a letter from your home institution stating that it will manage the funds for the project should a grant be made;

Applications are generally reviewed within 6-8 weeks. Grants will be approved or rejected with no possibility of subsequent negotiation.

Research at the Year End, 2017

On June 1, the SSRC held its first Research Round Up, to commemorate the end of the academic year.  DePaul faculty members who have worked with SSRC staff or resources over the course of the year were invited to present on their work.

The event was held in Arts and Letters and was well-attended by members of the DePaul community.  After SSRC Director Greg Scott introduced each of the presenters, CDM Faculty member Robin Burke gave an update of the Reading Chicago Reading project- an interdisciplinary venture he has been working on during the last year with DePaul English faculty member John Shanahan.   Funded by the National Endowment for the Humanities, Burke and Shanahan started with a well-defined question and problem: Is it possible to predict popularity of One Book, One Chicago selections using library and demographic data?  As the project has advanced, their connections and relationships to other scholars in the DePaul community have allowed them to broaden their interests and start pushing the boundaries of what is possible.  Currently, they are working on text analysis of One Book books, but also text analysis of reviews of those books.

Shailja Sharma from International Studies talked about her experience breathing life into a new research area and project.  She talked about the lengths that she went to, cobbling together small grants, and relying on Skype interviews to move her recent book project, Postcolonial Minorities in Britain and France: In the Hyphen of the Nation-State forward, little by little.

Next, Writing, Reading and Discourse faculty member Sarah Read discussed strategies for keeping two separate research agendas going.  In her presentation, she showed a table that included a work plan and how she moved each project along, little by little.  For Sarah, wanting to maintain two separate research agendas meant that she had work on them simultaneously- not one at a time.  In her talk, she discussed the importance of making sure that all of her scholarly activity fit squarely within those agendas.   She also discussed the importance of having a group at DePaul that kept her accountable and productive.  She said that this kept her research on her desk every week, so that when there were breaks in teaching, she was able to spend less time reorienting herself with her research and materials, and more time writing.

Finally, Political Science Assistant Professor Ben Epstein reported on his experiences turning his PhD into a book proposal and how he survived the revision and re-submission process before signing the book contract.  One of the biggest issues he grappled with during the revision process was staying true to the spirit of the original work, and not letting suggestions from others change the book.  For him, revising came down to three things: 1.  Make it better, not different.  2.  Agree with a suggestion or defend why you can’t.  3.  Don’t underestimate the energy and time it takes to write the response to the editors and reviewers.  He stressed the importance of finding tools that work.  For some people, they work better in an analogue environment, writing their to-do list down others do better with an app that helps them manage their process.  He also strongly recommends the book, On Writing Well: The Classic Guide to Writing Nonfiction by William Zinsser.

The event closed with a Q&A with the presenters.  In all, it was a great event, with many agreeing that there should be another event in 2018.